On 03/22/2014 03:12 PM, Alex Bligh wrote: > Apologies for broken threading (wasn't subscribed) and possible newbie > mistakes: > >> Well, it depends how close the code is. Having looked at backporting it, I >> feel >> too much has changed to risk it. >> >> We need an OPENJDK-6 bug for this that references the fact the change is in >> 6989466. >> >> You can list me as a reviewer. > > I think this bug is also present elsewhere in openjdk-6, specifically in the > jvm.
Yes. However, this doesn't have the same evil effects as the zero jdk_version_info bug. It should be fixed, though. Andrew.
