On 07/01/2014 11:15 AM, Nikolay Gorshkov wrote:
> From another side, we did extensive testing of the build of
> {OpenJDK 6 + 6650759 backport} using all JDK 6 tests available
> to us, both general and javac specific. We didn't find any
> single failure caused by the backport. So, in practice we
> don't see any indication of regressions or incompatibilities
> caused by the backport, and such, honestly, we see no reason
> for backing out the backport.
>
> Please, let us know if you are aware of a test suite that
> shows regressions or any kind of problems introduced by
> this changeset.
I'm not at all sure that this is a sound argument. If there was
a test that showed regressions, you surely would have been told
about it already.
I don't know that this patch is bad; I don't know that is is good.
I do know that it was rejected.
On the other hand, it was accepted for IcedTea. I don't know why
it was accepted; maybe that was before the patch was rejected
upstream.
Andrew Hughes, do you know?
Andrew.
