On 26/11/14 21:49, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> As it's basically removing a no-op, this shouldn't actually change
> anything much, but will make other planned backports easier and
> perhaps help performance very slightly in removing some completely
> unnecessary method calls.

Ah, thanks.  I was thinking "Why on Earth does he want to change
this code now?" but I accept the argument about backports.

Andrew.

Reply via email to