On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:54 -0800, Joe Wang wrote: > Thanks Andrew. That explains why :) The jaxp bugs on OpenJDK Bugzilla > were actually passed onto me by Alan, by the way. > > So it seems to me, JAXP Jira is a better option since I would be > noticed when new issues are created. I can then add Oracle Bug ID as > you mentioned. >
Hi Joe - so is the JAXP Jira system the master copy for JAXP issues? ie can I expect to see all JAXP issues on it regardless of where they were originally raised? > Regards, > Joe > > > On 2/7/2011 11:20 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > On 7 February 2011 18:38, Joe Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On 2/7/2011 1:16 AM, Steve Poole wrote: > > > > > > > snip... > > > > > > > Bugs can also be filed through OpenJDK Bugzilla, but so far, we only had > > > two, e.g. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 > > > > > > > > > > That's probably because: > > > > * You can STILL only use it to post patches, not report bugs. It > > never moved on to the later stages that were planned. > > * Most of them are ignored (though the JAXP ones seem to be a happy > > exception to this norm) > > * The bug IDs can't be used to commit (see the first point) so you > > need an Oracle bug ID anyway, which I usually request from the Oracle > > dev. who reviews the patch. Seems to be much quicker for them than > > us... > > > > It would be nice to see some, if not all, these things fixed, but > > that's why I guess you're seeing low bug reporting in there. > >
