Hi, John has now been kind enough to create the forests for 7u6. There was a build problem for B17, so they had to re-spin the build, hence B18. 7u6 [1] and 7u6-dev [2] are created of out jdk7u#jdk7u6-b18.
Please use jdk7u6-dev [2] for fixes targeted to 7u6. Cheers, Edvard [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u6 [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u6-dev On Jun 28, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Edvard Wendelin wrote: > Hi, > > Due to July 4th being a public holiday in the US and how that affects > integration schedules, I'd like to propose that we move the creation of the > forest to July 5th and the jdk7u6-b17 tag instead. > > Sorry for the late notice, but it was feedback we got after the first email > was sent out. > > Thanks, > Edvard > > On 06/28/2012 01:28 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to propose the following stabilisation forests for 7u6 to be >>> created on July 2nd: >>> >>> hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u6 based on >>> hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/ tag jdk7u6-b16 >>> hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u6-dev based on >>> hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/ tag jdk7u6-b16 >>> >>> Build 16 is scheduled for June28th. jdk7u6-dev is the development >>> forest open for fixes that has passed the critical approval process. >>> [1] See my email on the end game update for more details. After July >>> 2nd, the next build in jdk7u will be for jdk 7u8. >>> >>> If you have any objections or concerns, let me know before the end of >>> this week. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Edvard >>> >>> [1] >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2012-February/001900.html >> Good to see a clear tag for the branch point this time! :-)
