> Yes. I think the static library was only split out into its own RPM > from a relatively recent Fedora (whichever was being developed in > Feb-Mar 2011, as that's when we hit this same error), but it's preferable > to link dynamically in all cases. I believe the library was split out because > pretty much everything else links dynamically and doesn't need it.
Shouldn't it be general case for OpenJDK on Linux to use dynamic linking with stdc++ like all others libs ? If so STATIC_CXX=false should be generalized for now only RH but all Linux distros isn't it ?
