Thanks for the pointer Tim. I'm aware of the nodupes option and it's useful.
I think my issue is different in that I'm seeing recipients being
deleted by the openJDK mailer/mailman. It would be the equivalent to my
address being taken off the cc list in the mail you just sent. Perhaps I
should take my query off this jdk7u-dev list and onto one more suitable
for such topics.
regards,
Sean.
On 04/09/2012 18:24, Tim Bell wrote:
Hi Seán:
On a totally unrelated note...
I cc'ed Alan in the below email but the openJDK mailer seems to strip
out cc recipients if they're on the openJDK alias. (from what I can
make out) - This doesn't help folks who might have filters set up for
"to or cc:" fields.
any ideas on whether this can be changed ? I'm not sure if it was
always happening. I've only seen it occur in past ~1-2 months.
In Mailman terminology, this is called "nodupes -- Does the member
want to avoid duplicates of the same message?"
This setting is controlled by each user for each list they join.
Taking the jdk7u-dev list as an example, both you and Alan have ticked
the box for 'nodupes' which means you should only get one copy of my
reply here, even though I explicitly added you as CC: addressees.
If a list user wants to see _all_ email, they should double check
their settings for the 'not metoo' and 'nodupes' options in their
mailman configuration.
For more information, check the GNU Mailman - List Member Manual:
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/mailman-member.html
Regards-
Tim
regards,
Sean.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Request for approval: 7190219 (bf)
CharBuffer.put(String, int, int) modifies position even if
BufferOverflowException thrown
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:55:09 +0100
From: Seán Coffey <[email protected]>
To: Neil Richards <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
Hey Neil,
I wouldn't regard this as a risky fix and don't see a problem with it
going into jdk7u-dev now (before phase2 approval process begins in mid
September) It also benefits from having a unit testcase. Testing (jtreg
tests) in the jdk8/tl repos would have occurred on a regular basis also
since the fix was push there.
Alan was initial reviewer and may wish to comment (cc'ed)
regards,
Sean.
On 04/09/2012 13:30, Neil Richards wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 09:58 +0100, Seán Coffey wrote:
Approved for jdk7u-dev. (7u10)
I've created a bug record for this and will mark as fixed once I see
your push.
cc'ing initial reviewer also.
regards,
Sean.
On 03/09/2012 05:18, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi folks,
Here's a request of porting the fix of 7190219 back to JDK7, could
you
please review it?
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7190219
Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/bf0c6f91bc22
Thread where it was reviewed:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-August/011087.html
Thanks,
Jonathan
Hi Sean,
It looks like this changeset has not yet been promoted from the
component (tl) forest to the master jdk8 repository.
Please confirm, in light of this, if you'd like this change to be
applied to jdk7u at this point, or if you would like it to spend some
(more) time being proved in the jdk8 stream prior to this happening.
Regards,
Neil
