Approved.

On Oct 24, 2012, at 11:20 AM, Seán Coffey <sean.cof...@oracle.com> wrote:

> 
> Looking to back out this fix from 7u for now.
> Review link is here : 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/2012-October/001944.html
> 
> Alan Bateman has reviewed on nio thread.
> webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8000178/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ecoffeys/webrev.8000178/>
> bug report : http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8000178
> 
> Regards,
> Sean.
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:      RFR : (bf) Backout 7190219 fix for jdk7u (JCK issue)
> Date:         Fri, 05 Oct 2012 18:10:13 +0100
> From:         Seán Coffey <sean.cof...@oracle.com>
> To:   Jonathan Lu <luc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, nio-dev 
> <nio-...@openjdk.java.net>
> 
> 
> 
> Jonathan,
> 
> I'm looking to back this fix out of jdk7u-dev since it's causing a JCK 
> failure. The JCK test itself is too strict but we should play safe and revert 
> behaviour for 7u now until the JCK issue is resolved.
> 
> There's a JCK bug following the JCK test issue  (7199569)
> 
> ===
> JCK test api/java_nio/CharBuffer/index.html#Methods2[appendCharSequence0006]
> assumes that ReadOnlyBufferException has some priority over 
> BufferOverflowException if an application attempts to put a String into a 
> read-only CharBuffer that has insufficient space. The spec does not 
> explicitly state, which exception should be thrown if several constraints are 
> violated at the same time, so the test should be fixed/relaxed.
> ====
> 
> Here's the backout webrev : (obtained with hg backout (& interrupted))
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8000178/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ecoffeys/webrev.8000178/>
> 
> JDK bug report : 8000178 (not visible yet)
> 
> ==========
> The fix for 7190219 causes a JCK failure.
> api/java_nio/CharBuffer/index.html#Methods2[appendCharSequence0006]
> 
> That JCK test in itself is too strict and is under review via Bug ID 7199569. 
> For the purpose of update release though, we should withdraw the 7190219 fix.
> ==========
> 
> regards,
> Sean.
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to