Both changesets now pushed to jdk7u-dev/jdk [1] [2]. Regards, Neil
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/87abc0c4804d [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/5341e088e9a3 On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 11:00 +0000, Seán Coffey wrote: > Good point Masayoshi. > > Deven, to keep in sync with jdk8 you might consider importing the > 7172177 changeset also: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/60033ab79213 > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7172177 > > Consider that approved for jdk7u-dev push. > > regards, > Sean. > > > On 31/10/12 10:02, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote: > > Hi Deven, > > > > The fix itself looks good, but I believe the test was removed in JDK 8 > > later. > > > > Thanks, > > Masayoshi > > > > On 10/31/2012 4:54 PM, Deven You wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> This is a request for approval to push the fix of 7094176 from jdk8 > >> to jdk7u, could anyone take a look? > >> > >> Link to the bug: > >> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7094176 > >> > >> Changeset in jdk8: > >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/71cf74329a9e > >> > >> Webrev for jdk7u: > >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~youdwei/ojdk-557/webrev/ > >> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyoudwei/ojdk-557/webrev/> > >> > >> The webrev for jdk7u is the same as of jdk8. > >> > >> Review thread for jdk8 starts at: > >> > >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2012-May/000613.html > >> > >> Thanks a lot! > >> > > > -- Unless stated above: IBM email: neil_richards at uk.ibm.com IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
