Even if the patches apply cleanly, these need to go through
hsx/jdk7u/hotspot and pushed via jprt,
please send or point me to the patches and I will then get then in via jprt
and then in the master after PIT
Thanks
Alejandro
On 1/15/2014 4:51 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
If Calvin's changesets apply cleanly to 7u/hotspot and test results
are good, we shouldn't have a problem.
Alejandro - can you ensure these get into the 7u60 line ?
Thanks,
Sean.
On 15/01/14 10:57, Chan, Sunny wrote:
Sorry I don't have an OpenJDK id. This is my first "contributions" to
OpenJDK.
Would I need to work with Alejandro on this?
-----Original Message-----
From: Seán Coffey [mailto:sean.cof...@oracle.com]
Sent: 15 January 2014 18:56
To: Chan, Sunny [Tech]; Alejandro E Murillo
Cc: 'jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net'
Subject: Re: [7u60] Request for approval for 8017498: JVM crashes
when native code calls sigaction(sig) where sig>=0x20
Hi Sunny,
all 3 bug fixes have been approved for jdk7u-dev. Please push the
changesets to the hotspot team forest. Do you have an OpenJDK id ?
Alejandro may have to work this one given the hotspot factor.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8017498
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8020791
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8021296
Regards,
Sean.
On 07/01/14 13:22, Seán Coffey wrote:
Hi Sunny,
as per the current 7u60 putback process [1], these three bugs need to
have the '7u60-critical-request' label added to the master bug record.
I've just done that now. Once they're marked approved, let's revisit
this thread.
Since the fixes are in the hotspot area, the backports should be
pushed to the hotspot team integration forest.
alejandro.muri...@oracle.com can help you with that nearer push time.
regards,
Sean.
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2013-November/008070.
html
On 02/01/14 02:25, Chan, Sunny wrote:
Hi all,
This is a request to backport a jdk8 fix into jdk7u60, along with
subsequent changes to the regression tests:
8017498 : JVM crashes when native code calls sigaction(sig) where
sig>=0x20
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8017498
The current jsig implementation is unable to deal with sigaction
request if signumber is > 32. The patch modifies the signal handler
so that signal > 32, which is not used in the JVM, to ignore and
install the handler request directly.
This fix is already included in jdk8's hotspot as:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/732af649bc3a
The discussion thread for Java 8 can be found here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2013-July/
008031.html
Notice that current the regression tests that Calvin has provided has
a few issues and this has been fixed in the following subsequent
updates:
Bug fix 1 (native code failed to compile on some platform, 8020791):
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/hotspot/rev/72727c4b6dec
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2013-July/
008312.html
Bug fix 2 (failed to find gcc, 8021296):
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/hotspot/rev/f9ee986a9fea
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2013-July/
008421.html
I have verified that if you applied the original bug fix and then
subsequent testbug fix to the JDK 7 branch, it applies cleanly and
resolved the issues.
Thanks.
Sunny Chan, Executive Director, Technology Goldman Sachs (Asia)
L.L.C. | 68th Floor | Cheung Kong Center | 2 Queens Road Central |
Hong Kong
email: sunny.c...@gs.com | Tel: +852 2978 6481 | Fax: +852 2978 0633
This message may contain information that is confidential or
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the
sender immediately and delete this message. See
http://www.gs.com/disclaimer/email for further information on
confidentiality and the risks inherent in electronic communication.
--
Alejandro
