Keep in mind that this Project is currently not accepting further contributions as it has accomplished what it set out to do in June 2011.

Current activity in this Project is focused on enabling a successful
transition of Project Leads. A future Project Lead can set the technical direction anew and decide which contributions, if any, to accept.

cheers,
dalibor topic

On 20.05.2015 05:25, david buck wrote:
Hi John!

As Oracle is no longer directly contributing changes for JDK7 to OpenJDK
[0], the backport work done for the upcoming 7u85 release of Oracle JDK
is not available in any of the public Mercurial repositories.

Oracle JDK 7u85 will be available for Oracle's support customers [1].
For OpenJDK, the community has the option of backporting the change from
JDK8 [2] to JDK7 and pushing it into the public Mercurial repository.

Cheers,
-Buck

[0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2014-April/008910.html

[1] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html

[2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/rev/518f0c5574ef

On 2015/05/20 11:56, john.e.gr...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
For my own education, where would I find the fix in Mercurial?  I
looked in jdk7u and jdk7u-dev but don't see it.  For jdk8, I see it in
jdk8u.

Thanks

John


-----Original Message-----
From: Seán Coffey [mailto:sean.cof...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 4:47 PM
To: Gregg, John E.; jdk7u-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Backporting sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker change to
jdk7u?

John,

the change you're referring to seems to be
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8075750

It's fixed for 7u85 which is an upcoming JDK release.

Regards,
Sean.

On 19/05/2015 22:31, john.e.gr...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
Hi all,

On April 10 a change was committed to jdk8u that I'd like to see
backported to jdk7u.  The change set is a large one:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk/rev/ea62ea52af27.  I
don't know anything about the background of the change.  The checkin
comment just says "Merge."  I don't know where it was merged from but
it seems to be a bundle of unrelated changes.

The substance of the change to sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker is
to make the triple handshake fix check all subject alternate names of
types "IP address" and "DNS" and not just the first of each.  The
current behavior, introduced in in 1.7.0_71 I think, is unnecessarily
restrictive.  I believe the change is just a single file.

Thanks


John Gregg





--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

Oracle | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment

Reply via email to