Biju,

Why don't you pull the patch into your own forest and build a local copy ? I could be a few weeks/months before this fix becomes public in an Oracle JDK release. Oracle jdk7u releases are no longer public. Last public one was 7u80.

Regards,
Sean.

On 18/08/2015 00:21, Biju G.S Nair wrote:
Hi Ivan,
    Since our applications are getting killed under load due to OOM, it will
be very helpful if we can get this patch back ported so that we can use
them immediately. I am not familiar with the process of how patches are
prioritized. Please let me know if I can do anything to get priority for
this patch.

Thanks,
Biju

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Biju G.S Nair <gs.b...@gmail.com> wrote:

Thank you Ivan for looking into the request. Hope the merge is pretty
straight forward.

Thanks,
Biju

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Ivan Gerasimov <ivan.gerasi...@oracle.com
wrote:
Hi Biju!

I'll see if I can backport that change to jdk8u.

Sincerely yours,
Ivan


On 10.08.2015 19:57, Biju G.S Nair wrote:

Thanks Andrew for the response.

Hi JDK8 development team,
       Could you please back port and merge the patch
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6857566 in JDK 8. This will
help
in resolving OOM issues in our applications which is using
DirectByteBuffer. This will also help the JDK 7 dev team to merge the
patch
into their code base and that is the version we are using.

Thanks,
Biju



Thanks,
Biju

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote:

On 08/10/2015 04:25 PM, Biju G.S Nair wrote:
Hi There,
     Our application is failing with unexpected OOM when using Java
DirectByteBuffer and the fix
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6857566 currently merged to

JDK 9

which includes a scaling sleep time should help us and may be others as
well who are using JDK 7. Is there a way this patch can be back ported

and

merged into JDK 7 since the fix seems to be pretty straight forward.
That
will be very helpful and your response is much appreciated.

Yes, but it should be back-ported to JDK8u.  It's not at all
conventional
to skip a JDK release.

Andrew.





Reply via email to