On 22/07/16 09:35, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > Hmm, I would not consider the original port broken, it's what we used > productive for several years before. > Sure the code that exists now has some issues fixed (7 I think), but that's > only > the normal continuous bugfixing you have in any product.
OK, so this is what must happen. The port itself comes in as a clean patch which builds and runs. Subsequent patches come in on top of that. I hope that will suit everyone. Andrew.