Voting for Deven [1] is now closed. Yes: 0 Veto: 1 Abstain: 1
According to the Bylaws definition, this is insufficient to approve the nomination.
Many thanks to John and Mark's kind advice, I will think much more carefully about the the word "significant" in the future. And also I believe Deven will continue to work hard and contribute to the OpenJDK community.
Best regards - Jonathan [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-July/002816.html On 2013年08月05日 12:16, [email protected] wrote:
Vote: veto I agree with everything that John Rose wrote in response to this nomination [1]. Deven's contributions are appreciated, but taken together they do not constitute a set of eight or more significant changesets. - Mark [1]http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-July/002817.html
