This looks like a nice refinement.
Some immediate bits of feedback:
- The size of <pre> and {@code } elements differs. (14.4px vs 14px). This is
also a problem with the existing templates.
- Why px for most but not all measurements? I would personally prefer to see em
units used to tie sizing of elements to user's preferences.
(http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/css2em.htm) At minimum, use either all px or all em.
To see badness, drastically adjust the size of your default font. E A few UI
elements will now look weird (Trademarks, legal text, height of nav bars, etc.
- All of the text could be somewhat higher contrast. #666666 is too low for
body copy. Perhaps it's just the Deja Vu font. I keep thinking the text is
transparent.
- Verdana would be preferable to Arial as a fallback for headings.
Mike
On Nov 6 2013, at 13:43 , Bhavesh Patel <bhavesh.x.pa...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Based on the feedback received on the new UI implementation in JDK 7
> javadoc, we have made some minor changes to look and feel of the API pages
> generated by javadoc in JDK 8. The JDK API documentation pages will be using
> DejaVu font. A sample build, using the DejaVu fonts, can be found at
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpatel/docs/dejaVu/api/. Non-JDK API
> documentation pages that are generated by the user of the javadoc tool will
> be using non-DejaVu fonts as specified in the stylesheet.css file. A sample
> build can be found at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpatel/docs/api/.
> Please provide any feedback, that you might have, on these new look and
> feel changes in both the versions.
>
> Regards,
> Bhavesh.
