On 03/13/2014 11:09 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Mar 12, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Remi Forax <[email protected]> wrote:
As you have seen a lambda is not an anonymous class :)
A non-serializable lambda is more lightweight than an anonymous class so the
generic information that are transmitted from the bytecode to the runtime (the
lambda metafactory) are not kept inside the lambda class (a lambda class may be
shared by several different lambdas).
Seems like the reflection API is at the wrong level and a Java model/mirror API
might be able to handle this correctly?
yes, it's a hack,
using a declared type (type are artifact of the compiler) at runtime (in
the VM realm) to convert a message is not very natural.
yes, it's possible to use an annotation processor for that, it's a far
better that trying to emulate the compiler job at runtime.
Now, requiring an annotation processor make the API heavier to use.
Paul.
cheers,
Rémi
