Hi Craig,
yes, I forgot about the legal issues adding an annotated version of the spec to the wiki. I changed the text of the assertion section on the wiki.
Regards Michael
Hi Michael,
On Feb 18, 2005, at 2:56 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi Craig,
Hi Michael,
Can you please make sure that the info in this message gets sent to the jdo-dev folks, either as an email or by updating a wiki page?
I decided to add the current version of the spreadsheet to the JDO wiki, because sending a file with suffix .sxc to this email alias does not work. I added a new section about TCK assertions to the TCK page of the JDO wiki (see http://wiki.apache.org/jdo/TechnologyCompatibilityKit).
You can download the current version of the spreadsheet from there. I propose we add the corresponding version of the annotated JDO spec there for download as soon as Michelle added the query assertions to the spec.
Small issue with the spec. It is under Sun license control. I will have to consult Sun Legal to figure out what to do here. Is it an issue to use the spreadsheet in conjunction with a non-assertion version of the spec?
Craig
What do you think?
Regards Michael
Thanks, Craig On Feb 17, 2005, at 8:10 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi Michelle,
attached you find a new version of the spreadsheet with the following changes:
- I renamed POM to POModel and updated the summary page.
- There was a assertion number typo: line 96 has number A14.6.6, but it
should be A14.4.6. The assertion text is. "Keywords must not be used as
package names, class names, parameter names, or variable names in queries."
- I reordered the query assertions and hope that they now match the
order the assertions appear in the spec. Please let me know if not, because then I need to update the spreadsheet.
- I modified the Permission sheet. I changed the numbering from N22-x to A22-x and added the missing assertion A22-4.
- If you agree I check in this version of the spreadsheet into the Sun cvs repository.
- I uploaded a new version of the apache JDO code to the wiki. It includes the attached version of the spreadsheet.
Regards Michael
Michael Bouschen wrote:
If you think it is best tested iin one test class, then I think it's fine.Hi Michelle,
thanks for the feedback. I will update the spreadsheet and send you a new version tomorrow.
- In the spreadsheet, you have *AA4.6.12-1* Result Class Requirements
Is the text of this one supposed to be all of that section, up to Table 6?
Yes, that was the intent. Is this too long for an assertion text? I was not sure, so I just took the section heading .
-- Michelle
--
Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
<JdoTckAssertionsTable.sxc>
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
--
Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
-- Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
