I agree as well. I thought it was there for some reason that I didn't remember or couldn't figure out.
--matthew "Wes Biggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Abe White wrote: > > > > >> I thought it would be nice for debugging to see the target class name > >> in the toString. > > > > > > I'm against this. It makes ids in URLs longer, makes parsing harder, > > and is unnecessary in general, IMO. It also leads to possible > > inconsistencies with the class encoded in the string and the class > > given to the String constructor. > > I'm with Abe. > > Wes
