I ask if a JDO implementation, in order to support java.lang.Object, can require from the classes to be persisted to implement Serializable.
Are there any requirements from LIDO to store Object types? Quoting "Matthew T. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > LiDO supports it. Any instance stored in the field whose type is Object > must be either a PC, a PI, or custom-mapped. > > --matthew > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:09 AM > >To: [email protected] > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: updates to tck11 project > > > > > >I wonder if we require developers willing to store java.lang.Object > >implement Serializable interface. JPOX requires it, what about others? > > > >Currently, the TCK does not implement Serializable. > > > > > >Erik Bengtson > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Michelle Caisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 7:21 AM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: updates to tck11 project > > > >Hi, > > > >I have made the following commits to tck11: > > > >- Fixed problem with Oid classes reported by Erik > >- Fixed a couple of minor problems with maven.xml in the > >runtck.single > >and enhance.*identity goals. > > > >-- Michelle > > > > > > >
