Hi,
I asked Michelle to add a discussion of JDO-188 to the agenda for
tomorrow.
I'd like to get the implementation into api20 quickly, so if we have
a volunteer to do this, great. But since it's an api20 issue, if no
one is going to work on it soon, I'll take it.
Please update the JIRA with the volunteer after the meeting so I can
see whether I need to work on it.
Thanks,
Craig
On Oct 27, 2005, at 12:39 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi Karan,
Hi,
I was looking at "AllOtherTests" on the wiki. I looked at A8.3-11
which is filed as JDO-188 on JIRA.
My understanding is that since A8.3-11 is an assertion for
JDOHelper, so the methods static Object[] getObjectIds (Object[]
pcs); static Collection getObjectIds (Collection pcs); should be
part of JDOHelper, right?
When I look at the JDOHelper javadocs, I do not find the methods
mentioned by this assertion. So, i would guess that those methods
have to be added to the api20, correct?
Yes, the JDOHelper in api20 does not (yet) provide the static
methods getObjectIds(Object[] pcs) and getObjectIds (Collection
pcs). They need to be added.
If one writes a test for the assertion, and if the some methods of
JDOHelper are being tested, then should test class/es should go
under the api.jdohelper package or the api.persistencemanager
package? The reason I ask this is because JDO-188 states that "
The test case api.persistencemanager.GetObjectIds needs a test
method per API. ". I thought it should be part of
api.jdohelper.GebObjectIds.
I agree, the test class should GetObjectIds go in package
api.jdohelper and not in api.peristencemanager as stated in JDO-188.
Regards Michael
--
Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66
Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
