Marco Schulze wrote:
Jörg von Frantzius wrote:
After having thought about it for a while, I started to doubt whether
we really need a "recursion-depth" number here. Can you think of a
case where you'd need any value greater than 1 here?
We have a case in which we need a "recursion-depth" greater than 1:
We use a tree of objects (all of the same class, self-referencing via
a Collection), where the GUI loads this tree initially with
recursion-depth=2 in order to immediately show the first level of the
tree expanded and the second level ready - with already knowing
whether an expand-icon needs to be visible or not. In other words: we
load always one level more in the tree than is visible for
Now that's convincing! Sorry for not having thought of this case, and
please forget about that "recurse-class-cycles" flag. I'd absolutely
second a proposal for a "recursion-depth" number; if anyone would ask
me, that is ;)
Regards,
Jörg
--
__________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inf. Jörg von Frantzius | artnology GmbH
| Milastr. 4
Tel +49 (0)30 4435 099 26 | 10437 Berlin
Fax +49 (0)30 4435 099 99 | http://www.artnology.com
_______________________________|__________________________
