Re: failover

[Craig L Russell]

Hi, I think it would be fine to raise a feature request on JIRA to track it. I could see it in a future JDO spec being a standard set of optional features given enough discussion. Craig On Dec 24, 2005, at 1:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok thanks. Do you think it should be considered for JDO 2.1 or 3? I can raise a JIRA feature request, so it might be easier to keep track later.   Erik Bengtson   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 11:16 PM To: JDO Expert Group; Apache JDO project Subject: Re: failover   Hi Erik,   I'm afraid I don't have the energy to take on this addition to the spec, but I'd encourage you to see if you can find other like-minded folks to make a standard set of connection properties for failover.   You can start a wiki page on the apache jdo site. You can use org.apache.jdo.options.failover as a prefix for the property names if they are discussed and agreed by the apache jdo project.   Does this give you enough direction on a strategy for standardizing the names?   Regards,   Craig   On Dec 23, 2005, at 6:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,   The standard allows setting up one data source per PMF. Failover mechanism to recover from like "cannot obtain a connection" or "broken connections" are not covered. Wouldn't be beneficial to cover such scenarios than upon failure will switch to a backup data source?   Regards,   Erik Bengtson   Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!   Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature