Re: InstanceLifecycleListener on detached instances

[Craig L Russell]

Hi Erik, Ah. I missed the context earlier. I don't see any technical issues. My biggest concern is that it's getting late in the cycle to add new features. What do other experts think? Is it worthwhile to open the spec for this? Craig On Dec 28, 2005, at 2:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig, A callback called when a detached instance is changed. (gets dirty) Regards, Quoting Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Erik, JDO 2 did not define any additional instance lifecycle callbacks, so there are none for JDO 2 features. The dirty callback is executed during a lifecycle change from clean to dirty, so it's not really suitable. What problem are you trying to solve? Craig On Dec 22, 2005, at 11:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Instance lifecycle listeners are only invoked if a PM is involved, but for detached instances none are called. The dirty listener is one that IMO could be called for detached instances. It means during detachment, a Dirty listener is assigned from the attached to the detached instance. Any thoughts? Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature