Hi Erik,
do you think we need to support super in JDOQL? You only need it if the
cancdidate class hides a supeclass field and if S is the superclass you
can write 'super.field' as '((S)this).field'.
Regards Michael
Craig,
In JDOQL BNF, it's not a valid field accessor. The same for ClassName.super
Current
-------
FieldAccess:
FieldName
Primary . FieldName
Regards,
Erik Bengtson
Quoting Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Erik,
It is not in the spec because it's already a Java keyword. Please see
14.4:
Keywords
Keywords must not be used as package names, class names, parameter
names, or variable names in queries. Keywords are permitted as field
names only if they are on the right side of the “.” in field access
expressions as defined in the Java Language Specification second
edition, section 15.11. Keywords include the Java language keywords
and the JDOQL keywords. Java keywords are as defined in the Java
language specification section 3.9, plus the boolean literals true
and false, and the null literal. JDOQL keywords maybe written in all
lower case or all upper case.
What specifically are you interested in knowing?
Regards,
Craig
On Jan 7, 2006, at 3:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is it intentionally not in the spec?
Regards,
Erik Bengtson
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
--
Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66
Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
