On Jan 21, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi Craig,
+1 for the released version.
The distribution is running good, I tested it with the SNAPSHOT release of JPOX as you described below.
However, I'm having problems with downloading the jdo2-beta jars from the maven repository, please see below ...
4. The release depends on artifacts that are only available on the staging release area, so you need to edit the maven location from which the artifacts are downloaded. Find the line of maven.xml in the project.properties file with the maven.remote.repo property, and add
What do you mean with maven.xml here? The project.properties in jdo2-tck-2.0-beta has the property maven.remote.repo.
Of course you are right. [The test information needs to be put onto a wiki and maintained. This was an oversight on my part.]
"http://www.apache.org/~clr/downloads/maven <
http://www.apache.org/%7Eclr/downloads/maven>" to the ibiblio and jpox urls. The JPOX releases might not be available until Sunday evening. Interim, you can manually download the nightly SNAPSHOT build and rename the jar file to the 1.1.0-beta-6 version.
I added the above to the maven.remote.repo property. But I'm having problems resolving the dependencies via maven, I get the following error message:
Attempting to download jdo2-api-2.0-beta.jar.
io.IOException: Unknown error downloading; status code was: 302
WARNING: Failed to download jdo2-api-2.0-beta.jar.
However, I could download the jars manually using the above url. So I really do not know why I could not download it via maven.
This is mysterious. I get similar results:
Attempting to download jdo2-api-2.0-beta.jar.
WARNING: Failed to download jdo2-api-2.0-beta.jar.
I realized some minor issues:
- The directory iut_jars is not included in the distribution, but it will be created on the first run of maven from the jdo2-tck-2.0-beta directory. This might be confusing, if you want to copy the iut jars before running maven. Maybe we could change this and include it as an empty directory. I'll take a look.
Yes, good idea. Your patch copied everything though. I guess it should be empty.
Thanks for the usual thorough review.