Hi Jörg,

On Feb 21, 2006, at 5:43 AM, Jörg von Frantzius wrote:

Sorry I was confused by the error message that sounded like I had to define the fetch-depth in my meta-data, i.e. that my meta-data was missing it. Stupid me. Or how would

   'Attribute "fetch-depth" must be declared for element type "field"'

sound to you, if you had never seen it before?

Interesting. Whose error message is this? If it is a standard parser message it's lame. If it's a JPOX error message, maybe it should be changed to:

"Unknown attribute 'fetch-depth' of element 'field'. Please check the spelling of the attribute."

Craig

Andy Jefferson schrieb:
currently JPOX' metadata parsing complains that 'Attribute "fetch- depth" must be declared for element type "field" ' for metadata that doesn't have fetch-depth anymore in fetch-groups fields' definitions.


Not for me it doesn't. Please define your input data and version of JPOX
Core/Enhancer.


How up-to-date is the public DTD supposed to be? Or should I rather somehow try to refer to the DTD that is coming with JPOX?


When JPOX finds the "standard" DTD definition it utilises its own copy of the DTD (which is typically as up-to-date if not more than that in Apache JDO). It
already has recursion-depth and has for several days.





Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to