Hi Erik,Sorry, you are right. The spec is inconsistent. I agree with you that 21.20 is right and 7.5 is wrong. This will go on the "errata" list for the next spec update.
Craig On Mar 6, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Erik Bengtson wrote:
Craig,I thought it was a correction rather than an item to discuss. See spec 21.20Quoting Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Hi Erik,If the spec were still open, I'd agree to discuss it. But it isn't. :-( We can look at this for a future revision. By the way, the rationale was that it's less work in the enhancer to generate the code, but I admit the rationale is weak. But either way, it's a matter of the implementation checking for null or catching a NullPointerException versus catching a JDOFatalInternalException. I'd guess it's a "startup cost". Craig On Mar 6, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Erik Bengtson wrote:7.5 "If the class is abstract, null is returned." but should be "If the class is abstract, a JDOFatalInternalException is thrown."Craig RussellArchitect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/ jdo408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
