Hi, All issues in JPOX were solved but not the ones related to the newInstance tests.
> It's not clear to me in what state must be the instance created by this > method. Can someone answer this? Quoting Erik Bengtson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Craig, > > It's not clear to me in what state must be the instance created by this > method. > Can you clarify? > > Thanks > > Quoting Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi Erik, > > > > On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:21 PM, Erik Bengtson wrote: > > > > > Can someone with spring understanding check JDO-327 ? > > > > Your symptom is different from mine. Have you checked in all the code > > that gives you the error on pm.newInstance(IDentalInsurance.class) ? > > > > > > > > With me > > > JDO-241 > > > JDO-246 (Issue in derby, needs workaround implemented in JPOX) > > > JDO-337 (to be fixed tonight) > > > > > > Work not started > > > JDO-326 (abstract class support) > > > > Note that this is not abstract class support. The parameter is a > > concrete class. "All the implementation has to do" is to recognize > > that the parameter is PersistenceCapable, and call the jdoNewInstance > > () method that's enhanced into the class. > > > > Regards, > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > Quoting Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I'm looking at JDO JIRA issues 241, 246, 326, 327, and 337, and I'm > > >> assuming that these issues are being looked at by the JPOX folks. > > >> > > >> Please correct me if there's some TCK activity needed here. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Craig > > >> > > >> Craig Russell > > >> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/ > > >> jdo > > >> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Craig Russell > > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > > > > > >
