[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-111?page=all ] Michael Bouschen reopened JDO-111: ----------------------------------
> Types of key/value columns and index columns in join tables > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JDO-111 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-111 > Project: JDO > Type: Bug > Components: tck20 > Reporter: Michael Watzek > Assignee: Michael Watzek > > PC classes like "HashtableStringValueCollections" have several fields of type > "java.util.Map" where (sometimes) keys are FCOs (e.g. SimpleClass instances) > and values are strings. The types of keys and values differ and can be > derived by the classname. > Each of these fields is mapped to a separate (join) table having join > columns, key columns, value columns, and index columns. In the current > schema, all of these columns have type "INTEGER". This is a bug. > Keys and values of type "java.lang.String" must be mapped to columns of type > "VARCHAR". Furthermore, join tables which are mapped by fields of maps or > sets do not have index columns. However, we should keep index columns for > TreeSets and TreeMaps. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
