[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-376?page=comments#action_12377165 ]
Ilan Kirsh commented on JDO-376: -------------------------------- Thank you for the fix and for the clarification regarding cleanupPM. > DeletePersistentFailsIfInstanceManagedByAnotherPersistenceManager - No > cleanup for pm > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JDO-376 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-376 > Project: JDO > Type: Bug > Components: tck20 > Versions: JDO 2 rc1 > Reporter: Ilan Kirsh > Assignee: Michael Bouschen > Priority: Minor > Fix For: JDO 2 final > > In > org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanager.DeletePersistentFailsIfInstanceManagedByAnotherPersistenceManager, > Line 77: It should be pm2 instead of pm, otherwise cleanup of pm is skipped > and a following test may fail. For instance running > org.apache.jdo.tck.query.api.Close after > DeletePersistentFailsIfInstanceManagedByAnotherPersistenceManager fails, > because the old PCPoint instances are still there. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
