Hi Andy,

On May 1, 2006, at 10:50 PM, Andy Jefferson wrote:

Hi Craig,

Do you have any particular requirements for the release of JPOX 1.1 as RI that we
need to be aware of when releasing ?

It has to pass the TCK (now in voting).

With respect to CVS tags of the code, I propose tagging the release as JDO_2_RI
as well as RELEASE_1_1_0 (our usual release tag)

I don't see a problem with this.

We will be releasing the usual bundles for 1.1.0 :-
1. Binaries : jpox-1.1.0.jar, jpox-enhancer-1.1.0.jar, jpox-1.1.0.rar
2. Source : jpox-1.1.0-src.tar.gz, jpoz-1.1.0-src.zip,
jpox-enhancer-1.1.0-src.tar.gz, jpox-enhancer-1.1.0-src.zip
3. Docs : jpox-docs-1.1.0.tar.gz, jpox-docs-1.1.0.zip

In addition there are (already) 1.1.0 versions of all Plugins (DBCP, C3P0, etc)
that are usable with the RI.

Anything else ?

We assume that the jar files are available for maven to download, so they need to be accessible to tck via tck20/ project.properties:maven.repo.remote = http://www.ibiblio.org/maven, http://www.jpox.org/downloads/maven

That's all I can think of. Congratulations.

Craig


--
Andy


Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to