Hi Marc,

Thanks for submitting this bug report.

Would it be possible for you to attach a patch to the issue? That makes it a lot easier for one of the committers to test and check in the fix.

Thanks,

Craig

On Aug 29, 2006, at 5:05 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux (JIRA) wrote:

IsTransactionalFalse makes invalid assumption that transaction is optimistic ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------

                 Key: JDO-409
                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-409
             Project: JDO
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: tck20
    Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
            Reporter: Marc Prud'hommeaux


The test IsTransactionalFalse.testIsTransactionalFalse mandates that an instance will be persistent-clean after a field is accessed in a transaction. However, when the transaction type is optimistic, it is also valid for the instance to be persistent-nontransactional after a field access.

The test can be fixed by ensuring that the transaction is a datastore transaction. E.g.:

    public void testIsTransactionalFalse() {
        pm = getPM();
        Transaction tx = pm.currentTransaction();
tx.setOptimistic(false); // make sure the transaction is not optimisitic
        tx.begin();


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/ software/jira



Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to