[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-419?page=comments#action_12434330 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-419: -----------------------------------
The patch is an elegant solution to the issue. The only other option is to require an exception to be thrown in case the implementation is BinaryCompatible, which would require a specification change. This would also require a more extensive change to the test. I'm not sure that it's worth it. Other opinions? > StateTransitions incorrectly asserts that field access in a deleted instance > will throw an exception > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JDO-419 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-419 > Project: JDO > Issue Type: Bug > Components: tck20 > Affects Versions: JDO 2 final > Reporter: Marc Prud'hommeaux > Assigned To: Craig Russell > Priority: Minor > Attachments: JDO-419.patch > > > The series of states marked with "read field with active datastore > transaction" (element 14 of the "transitions" field of > org.apache.jdo.tck.lifecycle.StateTransitions) asserts that accessing a field > of a deleted instance will throw an exception. However, this is not mandated > by the spec, only suggested that it might happen. Section 5.5.6 reads: "Any > other access to persistent fields is not supported and might throw a > JDOUserException". > The only easy fix is to just remove the "read field with active datastore > transaction" test specifications. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
