[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-424?page=all ]

Craig Russell reassigned JDO-424:
---------------------------------

    Assignee: Craig Russell

> StateTransitions makes undocumented assertions in detachCopy with active tx
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JDO-424
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-424
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tck20
>    Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
>            Reporter: Marc Prud'hommeaux
>         Assigned To: Craig Russell
>
> In StateTransitions.java, a couple of the transition assertions that are made 
> in the "detachCopy with active tx" scenario are not documented:
> Element 4 (0-based) asserts that HOLLOW will remain UNCHANGED when 
> detachCopy() is called on them. However, this doesn't seem to be anywhere in 
> the spec, and also doesn't seem right, since a hollow instance would need to 
> instantiate its fields in order to cascade the detach operation (subject to 
> the setting of the DETACH_LOAD_FIELDS setting).
> Element 9 asserts that a PERSISTENT_NONTRANSACTIONAL instance will remain 
> unchanged. However, for the same reason as above, it might transition to 
> persistent-clean due to reading a field.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to