[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-438?page=all ]
Michelle Caisse updated JDO-438:
--------------------------------
Attachment: RefreshAllSideEffects.java
I've attached a new file RefreshAllSideEffects.java that replaces both
RefreshAllWithArraySideEffects.java and
RefreshAllWithCollectionSideEffects.java. The new test invokes refreshAll()
with both a Collection and Object[] parameter sequentially depending on the
value of a flag:
if (useCollection)
pm1.refreshAll(points1);
else pm1.refreshAll(points1.toArray());
Michael, it would be great if you could test this on a multicore machine. To
test, you will need to modify conf/pm.conf or create a simple test conf file
referencing the new file name.
Please review. It's a bit ugly.
> More Derby "ERROR 40XL1" issues with multithreaded tests
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-438
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-438
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tck20
> Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
> Reporter: Michael Bouschen
> Assigned To: Michelle Caisse
> Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>
> Attachments: derby-dsid-pm-junit.txt, RefreshAllSideEffects.java
>
>
> I see the same DERBY error: "ERROR 40XL1: A lock could not be obtained within
> the time requested" as reported in JDO-324 for two different test cases:
> - RefreshAllWithArraySideEffects
> - RefreshAllWithCollectionSideEffects
> The reason might be that I switched to a dual core machine.
> JDO-324 fixed test case RefreshAllNoParameterSideEffects. Maybe we need to
> apply the same fix to the other test cases RefreshAllWithArraySideEffects and
> RefreshAllWithCollectionSideEffects.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
