[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12478617
]
Craig Russell commented on JDO-469:
-----------------------------------
I like this idea.
Others?
> Delete by object id
> -------------------
>
> Key: JDO-469
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-469
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: api2, api2-legacy, specification
> Affects Versions: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
> Reporter: Matthew T. Adams
> Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>
>
> Currently, Query & PersistenceManager allow a user to get by query and by
> object id, respectively. However, symmetry is broken in the case of
> deletion: you can delete by query, but you cannot delete by object id. The
> result is that you are forced to use a query or load each object that you
> want to delete. I noticed this asymmetry when I came across a use case where
> I had the object id and wanted to delete by id without having to load the
> object or construct a query.
> Why don't the following PersistenceManager methods exist?
> void deleteObjectById(Class cls, Object key);
> void deleteObjectById(Object oid);
> void deleteObjectsById(Collection oids);
> void deleteObjectsById(Object[] oids);
> Can we add these?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
