Hi Erik,

On Apr 8, 2007, at 8:47 AM, Erik Bengtson wrote:

Quoting Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

This is a backward-incompatible change. But maybe we should consider
to request a datastore connection that would have that semantic by
adding a boolean flag to the getDataStoreConnection method indicating
that you want to be able to perform transactional updates with it.


Contractually speaking this change is incompatible, but it's undetermined when flush gets first called by the JDO implementation, so this feature is not
portable.

I'm afraid I don't know what you mean by "this feature" and "this change". If you want to guarantee that the datastore connection you get is enlisted in the JDO transaction, we can add a flag to guarantee it.

Craig


Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to