[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12506634
]
Craig Russell commented on JDO-403:
-----------------------------------
> On the JPOX annotations doc page
> http://www.jpox.org/docs/1_2/jdo/annotations.html, the examples for Table,
> JoinTable, and Secondary table all use name="tablename", but the actual
> attribute is table. Maybe this is just a bug in the doc, but maybe it really
> would be better to call the attribute name as with
> @Column(name="columnname"), @Query(name="queryname"), and many others.
I like the idea of using the name element for the name of the annotation. So
for Table, I think name is better. I'm still working through the join and
secondary table issues since these are not straightforward mappings from the
xml.
> JDO2 Annotations
> ----------------
>
> Key: JDO-403
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-403
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: api2
> Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
> Reporter: Andy Jefferson
> Assignee: Michelle Caisse
> Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>
> Attachments: jdo_2_1_annotations.jar
>
>
> It would be desirable for JDO2 to have its own set of annotations. We have
> developed a set within JPOX that would likely serve as a starting point for
> such a set. In my opinion they should be
> 1. Split into javax.jdo.annotations.jdo and javax.jdo.annotations.orm
> 2. Move ORM attributes from some of the JDO annotations and have a ORM
> annotation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
