Hi Craig,
> It might be a good time (as we're almost done with this) to replace
> @Field and @Property with @Persistent. That would make it easier to
> describe that either a field or property is being described.
While I agree totally with merging @Field and @Property, the use of
@Persistent is not appropriate.
@PersistenceCapable
public class MyClass
{
@Persistent(persistenceModifier=FieldPersistenceModifier.NONE)
String someFieldThatIsNotPersistent
}
so I tag a field that is not persistent with @Persistent ?
Any other idea for name? that suggests field/method/property ?
--
Andy (Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)
