Re: Minor: change String[ ] fields( ) to Field[ ] fields( ) in @Index and @Unique

[Craig L Russell]

So I think for Index, Unique, and ForeignKey, just the field/property names are enough. So String[ ] should be used.

Craig

On Jul 18, 2007, at 9:54 PM, Andy Jefferson wrote:

For Embedded and FetchGroup, there's more information needed and so @Field/@Property should be used.

Hi Craig,

And fields() has type String[ ]. Now that we have the ability to put
a name into Property and Field, should we change String[ ] fields()
default { }

--
Andy  (Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)

When specifying an index/unique with fields (or properties) would anyone specify more than just the field names? The field itself is defined elsewhere and they only need give a reference to it. Think that was the reason I used

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature