Re: Annotations for embedded Key, Value, and Element

[Craig L Russell]

Hi Andy,


On Jul 25, 2007, at 10:49 PM, Andy Jefferson wrote:

Hi Craig,

I disagree on that placement of the other flags, back on to

comes down to namings of the global flag, and the mapping details

1. "embedded", "embeddedMapping"
2. "embeddedElement", "embedded"

@Field/@Property. They relate specifically to the element, key, value so keep them on the associated annotation would be my vote. So then it really

longer specify the equivalent of "embedded-element" on the @Element

reinstated, as per the above proposal.

This seems to have been ignored (by the most recent check in) and users can no (similarly embedded-key on @Key, embedded-value on @Value). I would like them

Craig

Right about that. I've added back embedded to Key, Value, and Element. And changed the Embedded[] embedded to embeddedMapping.

--
Andy  (Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature