Hi Andy,

On Jul 30, 2007, at 12:51 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:

Hi Craig,

I agree that we're getting a bit far from reality with the framework
that we set up for deepEquality testing. It appears that a reflection-
based approach might work if we are unsuccessful in getting JPOX to
work with this artificial setup.

Michelle and I have already prototyped a reflective approach for
comparing two object graphs. So that's our Plan B in case it's too
much work to force-fit JPOX persistent interface.

Plan B shouldn't be needed. If all patches from JDO-503 are applied and latest
JPOX is used then companyAnnotatedNoRelationshipsPIPM test passes ;-)

Yay. Nice work!

Craig


--
Andy  (Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to