I meant 517 of course...

Craig

On Aug 15, 2007, at 7:25 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:


On Aug 15, 2007, at 1:09 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:

On 15 August  2007, Craig L Russell wrote:
that I can find are resolved with the patch to https://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-515.

If I've missed any, please let me know.

Hi Craig,

Persistent property <property> has to have "field-name" specified. When specifying this with @Persistent are people expected to use "name" ? or
perhaps we should add "fieldName" to be explicit and consistent ?

I think your comments here refer more to JDO-507. So let's close 515 and continue discussing 507.

Regards,

Craig



--
Andy  (Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to