> > Is the JDO vendor community still serious about JDO? > > If so, I think they should fund to keep JDOCentral alive... > > I'd like to see the same.
So I can understand your requirements better I ask the question "JDOCentral was what exactly ?" To me it was a central point for discussion of a technology. I would have thought that the logical successor is Apache JDO, or JPOX, or both. JDOCentral had :- 1. articles about use of JDO. JPOX has tried to provide an equivalent in the "Tutorials & Examples" section of our docs for each release. All docs are marked with what is JDO specific and what is an extension. 2. news about presentations etc. 3. forum for problems/discussions - that became a home to spammers for the final year of its life. Apache JDO has a mailing list for JDO-specific issues, and JPOX has a forum for real-world use. I've no problem with putting/moving any JPOX docs that are JDO-generic across on Apache JDO to facilitate a more logical division between technology and implementation. Perhaps you could define what more you mean with "keep JDOCentral alive"? -- Andy (Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)
