I think configurability of pbr is a mistake. I've never seen a case where pbr was not what customers wanted. Anyone have an example?

Craig

On Sep 19, 2007, at 4:05 PM, cbeams wrote:

Curious if we have considered the idea of introducing standardized configuration around persistence-by-reachability.

In JDO it is on by default for persist and update, and cannot be turned off In JPA it is off by default for persist and update, and can be turned on/off

JPOX has introduced this configurability as an extension; perhaps to keep abreast of JPA we should standardize it?

See http://www.jpox.org/docs/1_2/jdovsjpa.html for details on the above

- Chris Beams

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to