Hi Michelle,
That was very helpful. Running this branch looks much better.
Still I have problems with the following tests:
1. FetchPlanInterface.testGroups (fixed in JDO-402, after 2.0.1?)
2. ResultClassRequirements.testNegative (fixed in JDO-524)
3. ChangeQuery.testPositive (fixed in JDO-529)
4. ImplicitParameters.testGrouping (fixed in JDO-530)
5. StateTransitionsReturnedObjects (JDO-513, JDO-514).
Please advise.
Thanks, Ilan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michelle Caisse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: "JDO Expert Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: JDO TCK 2.0 - Which set of tests to use?
Hi Ilan,
There is a source branch 2.01 with changes responsive to some earlier
challenges. There's a wiki page documenting the issues
http://wiki.apache.org/jdo/TCKChallenges. Please get this branch from svn
and let us know if there are remaining issues.
Thanks,
Michelle
Ilan Kirsh wrote:
Is there an approved exclude list for the original JDO 2 TCK 2.0
that is more realistic than the bundled list of 2 enhancement tests?
If not, when ready, I can publish my exclude list as a suggestion.
Regards, Ilan
----- Original Message -----
From: Craig L Russell To: JDO Expert Group Cc: Apache JDO project Sent:
Tuesday, September 25, 2007 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: JDO TCK 2.0 - Which set of tests to use?
Hi Ilan,
On Sep 25, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Ilan Kirsh wrote:
Hi,
The JDO 2 TCK 2.0 package that is available for download at:
http://db.apache.org/jdo/releases/release-2.0.cgi
contains many invalid tests that have been fixed since that release.
Correct. The latest trunk has updated tests.
In order to claim compliance with JDO 2 should I use the tests at:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/jdo/trunk/tck2-legacy/ ?
Well, there's no official release of the JDO 2.1 test suite, so
probably to claim compliance with JDO 2.0, you should update the exclude
list and run the original tests. And you should take a look at the tck2
project as well.
Should I fill CHALLENGE against tests in that set that IMO are
invalid?
Yes. We still have time to fix these before official release.
Thanks,
Thank you for your continued support.
Craig
Ilan Kirsh
ObjectDB Software
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
