Hi Craig

Michelle Caisse added the files to the apache Maven 1 repository, that
is converted to Maven 2 and propagated to the central maven repository
and mirrors
See below

Unfortunately there's no easy way to fix it as it has been propagated
to all mirrors, downstream users,... already. You could either do a
new official release (2.2.1, 2.2.0.1, ...) or just copy the jar and
the good pom as 2.2-1 (naming convention used before to fix bad poms
with the same jar)

btw for Apache Maven repository issues, the best contact is
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:15 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Repository changed
> ==================
>
> Repository: /www/people.apache.org/repo/m1-ibiblio-rsync-repository/
>
> Added
> -----
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/jars/jdo2-util-2.2.jar.md5
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/jars/jdo2-enhancer-2.2.jar.asc
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/jars/jdo2-enhancer-2.2.jar.md5
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/jars/jdo2-model-2.2.jar
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/jars/jdo2-model-2.2.jar.asc
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/jars/jdo2-model-2.2.jar.md5
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/jars/jdo2-util-2.2.jar
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/jars/jdo2-util-2.2.jar.asc
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/jars/jdo2-enhancer-2.2.jar
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/poms/jdo2-util-2.2.pom.md5
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/poms/jdo2-enhancer-2.2.pom.asc
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/poms/jdo2-enhancer-2.2.pom.md5
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/poms/jdo2-model-2.2.pom
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/poms/jdo2-model-2.2.pom.asc
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/poms/jdo2-model-2.2.pom.md5
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/poms/jdo2-util-2.2.pom
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/poms/jdo2-util-2.2.pom.asc
> [mcaisse] org.apache.jdo/poms/jdo2-enhancer-2.2.pom
> [mcaisse] javax.jdo/jars/jdo2-api-2.2.jar
> [mcaisse] javax.jdo/jars/jdo2-api-2.2.jar.asc
> [mcaisse] javax.jdo/jars/jdo2-api-2.2.jar.md5
> [mcaisse] javax.jdo/jars/jdo2-api-legacy-2.2.jar
> [mcaisse] javax.jdo/jars/jdo2-api-legacy-2.2.jar.asc
> [mcaisse] javax.jdo/jars/jdo2-api-legacy-2.2.jar.md5
> [mcaisse] javax.jdo/poms/jdo2-api-2.2.pom
> [mcaisse] javax.jdo/poms/jdo2-api-2.2.pom.asc
> [mcaisse] javax.jdo/poms/jdo2-api-2.2.pom.md5
> [mcaisse] javax.jdo/poms/jdo2-api-legacy-2.2.pom
> [mcaisse] javax.jdo/poms/jdo2-api-legacy-2.2.pom.asc
> [mcaisse] javax.jdo/poms/jdo2-api-legacy-2.2.pom.md5
>




On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Steve Loughran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dont think Craig is too happy.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Fwd: Automatically generated POM for JDO (Maven 1 project)
> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:00:37 -0800
> From: Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Can someone in the repository infrastructure please let us know where/
> how the JDO Maven 2 pom.xml is being generated, how to fix it, and how
> to prevent this from occurring in future?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: November 6, 2008 5:34:45 AM PST
>> To: Maven Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: Apache JDO project <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Automatically generated POM for JDO (Maven 1 project)
>> Reply-To: [email protected]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can you please take a look at this issue? And reply to the jdo-dev
>> alias since we're not subscribed to maven users.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> M2 pom is incorrect, result in problems with transitive dependencies
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>                Key: JDO-612
>>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-612
>>            Project: JDO
>>         Issue Type: Bug
>>         Components: api2
>>           Reporter: Andy Jefferson
>>            Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 3
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>

Reply via email to