[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12657131#action_12657131
 ] 

Ilan Kirsh commented on JDO-591:
--------------------------------

> how does the impl know if it is a persistence-unit

I agree that persistence unit is different, and I do not suggest merging it 
with anything.
I wrote: "one add(String... args) method should replace addClasses, addFiles, 
addJar and addDirectory".
addPersistenceUnit(String) is probably required anyway.

> how does the impl know if it is ... or a mapping file, or a class file, or a 
> wildcard, or a directory name, or some random junk ?

Files should be identified anyway for command line enhancement. It is very easy 
to check if a file exists and if it is a directory. Jar and class files can be 
identified by their suffix. If it is not a file, it is either a class or junk.

Actually ObjectDB works this way, and there is no real impact on performance 
(also, usually there are only few arguments to check, such as *.class or 
package.*). This is negligible, relative for instance to searching package.jdo 
files everywhere, and writing all the result class files.

> What bearing does "subdirectories" have on the input from 
> addPersistenceUnit(), or addClass() ?

Sure, but the same is true for the command line, and still -s is a global 
option, doesn't it?
I just wanted to synchronize JDO-591 with JDO-621.



> Enhancer Invocation API
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: JDO-591
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-591
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: api2
>            Reporter: Andy Jefferson
>            Assignee: Andy Jefferson
>             Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 3
>
>         Attachments: jdoenhancer-5.patch
>
>
> Having a standard interface to invoke the enhancer makes a lot of sense so we 
> can have interchangeability of enhancers (for implementations that support 
> BinaryCompatibility). 
> A start point (for discussions) could be
> java -cp classpath  {enhancer-class} [options] [jdo-files] [class-files]
>     where options can be
>         -persistenceUnit persistence-unit-name : Name of a "persistence-unit" 
> to enhance the classes for
>         -d target-dir-name : Write the enhanced classes to the specified 
> directory
>         -checkonly : Just check the classes for enhancement status
>         -v : verbose output
> This then allows enhancement of the specified classes, or the classes defined 
> by the specified JDO files, or the classes defined by the specified 
> persistence-unit.
> What other control would people like to see ? 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to