Hi Andy, I've checked 2.0, it's not in there, so it must have been introduced post-2.0.
However I still have concerns with this approach: Normally PMFs are constructed via the static helper method contained in the vendor's PMF implementation. This introduces an alternative code path, which e.g. in our implementation is not the same, because our BootstrapPMF implementation decides based on certain properties which PMF implementation is actually used. Best regards, Christian From: Andy Jefferson <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected], Christian Ernst <[email protected]> Date: 30.07.2009 14:39 Subject: Re: broken tests in TCK testsuite > I hope this is the right list to report broken tests in the TCK testsuite, > I'm referring to TCK 2.0, ignore my post if these issues are resolved > meanwhile: > The following tests are broken, because they rely on a no-args ctor Hi Christian, Maybe I'm missing something but if I look at spec (JDO2.2 in my case, but not sure what version it appeared in - likely post-JDO2.0) section 11.1 <spec> The PersistenceManagerFactory implementation class must implement a no-args constructor. This allows the standard Java 6 service discovery implementation to create a factory instance ... </spec> -- Andy DataNucleus (http://www.datanucleus.org)
