> I have no objection to this proposal. I don't think we really need a > compatibility option, though. I can't think of a case where the user > is *depending* on an exception to be thrown that will suddenly fail > the application. TCK testing aside.
I have no objection to the change, BUT ... > It is very close to being too late for 2.3, unless you can get > DataNucleus committers to agree to the change. ... we need JDO 2.3 to be released. Shorter release cycles are the only way forward. This change can wait til 2.4; the option to use that is already in DN 2.1 (so people have their workaround), and DN 2.0 is the RI for JDO 2.3. -- Andy DataNucleus (http://www.datanucleus.org)
